On 13.02.2025 2:18 PM, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 02:44:02PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: >> On X Elite, there is a crypto engine IP block similar to ones found on >> SM8x50 platforms. >> >> Describe the crypto engine and its BAM. >> >> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250213-dt-bindings-qcom-qce-x1e80100-v1-1-d17ef73a1c12@xxxxxxxxxx/ >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi >> index 9d38436763432892ceef95daf0335d4cf446357c..5a2c5dd1dc2950b918af23c0939a112cbe47398b 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e80100.dtsi >> @@ -3708,6 +3708,36 @@ pcie4_phy: phy@1c0e000 { >> status = "disabled"; >> }; >> >> + cryptobam: dma-controller@1dc4000 { >> + compatible = "qcom,bam-v1.7.0"; > > Hm, I would expect this is at least "qcom,bam-v1.7.4", "qcom,bam-v1.7.0" > given that this is a pretty recent SoC. I don't think this makes any > functional difference though, and we don't seem to have it on other > recent SoCs... It is v1.7.4 fwiw Konrad
