<sorry for delay, i was out> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:31:21PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 8/10/2016 1:28 PM, Vinod Koul wrote: > >> That's why, I preferred not to call the callback when I observe an error which I > >> > think it makes more sense. > > That doesnt make sense. A client set a callback, it expect you to call one. > > The result quried maybe txn completed or error. Since you have means, please > > report.. > > > > If there is a good way to fix tx_status, I can certainly do so. I just need to make > sure my implementation is robust and reliable. > > I saw your reply that we need to keep this information around until terminate_all is > called. > > What is a good implementation strategy? > > Keep a size limited list with error cookies and flush them in terminate all? I think so, terminate_all anyway cleans up the channel. Btw what is the behaviour on error? Do you terminate or somthing else? > What should I do if code reaches to the size limit? > > Size the error cookie list double the size of available descriptors? That won't help as you would have two values per cookie and we dont want that :) > >> Again, it will be a different patch than this one. I think v2 of this patch > >> > needs to go in as it is. > >> > > >> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/31/64 > > I havent looked at the patch. If it is not invoking callback set by user, > > then I am not taking it. Sorry, we dont choose over client's wish. > > Ok. The problem you are referring to is something else and needs to be addressed > separately. I can create a series with first implement a reliable tx_status based > on your recommendation above. > > Then, change the current behavior so that client callback is always executed as you > requested. > > After that this patch to fix the free order. -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
