On 05/02/2025 11:49, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 05:30:32PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 28/01/2025 07:27, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: >>> >>> @@ -479,6 +519,230 @@ frame@b128000 { >>> status = "disabled"; >>> }; >>> }; >>> + >>> + pcie1: pcie@18000000 { >>> + compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq5332", "qcom,pcie-ipq9574"; >>> + reg = <0x00088000 0x3000>, >> >> So as Konrad pointed out now, this was never tested. It's not we who >> should run tests for you. It's you. > > This was tested and it did not flag an error since it is having the order > specified in the bindings. qcom,pcie.yaml has 4 reg specifications. Two of Hm, then please paste results of dtbs_check W=1 testing. Here. I am 100% sure you have there warning and I don't understand your reluctance to run the tests even after pointing it out by two people. Best regards, Krzysztof