On 1/28/2025 3:51 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28/01/2025 10:29, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote: >> On 1/28/2025 2:47 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 28/01/2025 10:10, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote: >>>> Add device-tree bindings for the ATH12K module found in the IPQ5332 >>>> device. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> .../net/wireless/qcom,ath12k-ahb.yaml | 317 ++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 317 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath12k-ahb.yaml >>> >>> It was v4, now v1? So entire previous discussion and feedback is >>> missing? Go to previous series and implement entire feedback. Then use >>> proper versioning, proper changelog and make it obvious/understandable >>> to us, instead of sending v1 after v4 in entirely separate thread. >>> >> >> I was asked to send DTS as a separate series, this is a new series for >> DTS hence stated with v1. > > > But we do not talk about DTS here, but bindings. > > >> To address the undocumented ABIs we have changes in dt-binding and hence > > That's v1 so how it could have changes in the first place? Unless this > is v5? > Sure, I understand your point now. I shouldn't have sent dt-binding here along with DTS as v1. dt-binding should go with wireless patch-set in v5. Let me know your thoughts on the next steps: 1. I will send v5 for 'wifi: ath12k: add Ath12k AHB driver support for IPQ5332' along with dt-binding. 2. In a separate series, I will send only DTS changes as v2, considering the review comments in this version as v1 for DTS.
