On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 05:15:39PM +0800, Yijie Yang wrote: > The qcs615-ride utilizes the same EMAC as the qcs404, rather than the > sm8150. > The current fallback could lead to package loss, and the ethernet on Packet? Package? > qcs615-ride was not utilized by anyone. I don't get how this part of sentence is connected to previous part. I see the "and" but what do you want to say here? Packages with qcs615 board were lost, therefore the ethernet was not used by anyone? Or packets could be lost and this means ethernet cannot be used? > Therefore, it needs to be revised, > and there is no need to worry about the ABI impact. Again, Oxford comma of joining entirely independent claues. Can you filter this via someone / ChatGPT / Google grammar / Outlook grammar? Best regards, Krzysztof
