On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 4:58 AM Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 12:55:55PM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 08:51:18AM -0800, Rob Clark wrote: > > > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > This series extends io-pgtable-arm with a method to retrieve the page > > > table entries traversed in the process of address translation, and then > > > beefs up drm/msm gpu devcore dump to include this (and additional info) > > > in the devcore dump. > > > > > > This is a respin of https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/94968/ > > > (minus a patch that was already merged) > > > > > > v2: Fix an armv7/32b build error in the last patch > > > v3: Incorperate Will Deacon's suggestion to make the interface > > > callback based. > > > v4: Actually wire up the callback > > > v5: Drop the callback approach > > > v6: Make walk-data struct pgtable specific and rename > > > io_pgtable_walk_data to arm_lpae_io_pgtable_walk_data > > > v7: Re-use the pgtable walker added for arm_lpae_read_and_clear_dirty() > > > v8: Pass pte pointer to callback so it can modify the actual pte > > > v9: Fix selftests_running case > > > v10: Call visit cb for all nodes traversed, leave the decision about > > > whether to care about non-leaf nodes to the callback > > > v11: Adjust logic in 3/4 [smostafa@] > > > > I see the level initialization was not removed as it was in the diff[1], so it > > seems to me that’s redundant as the level is set anyway in the callback, and > > actually looking at that I see it’s not used or printed from the driver, > > so may it can be removed all together, anyway that’s nit that may be Will can > > fix it up while merging. > > > > Otherwise, For the whole series > > Reviewed-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I'm happy to drop the 'level' field if it's not used. We can add it back > if/when it's needed. Rob? That works for me, thx BR, -R
