Hi Lina,
Couple of nitpicks here:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 03:56:12PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> From: Axel Haslam <ahaslam+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch allows domains to define idle states in the DT. SoC's can
> define domain idle states in DT using the "power-states" property of the
> domain provider. Calling of_pm_genpd_init() will read the idle states
> and initialize the genpd for the domain.
>
The commit message got out of sync here, the idle states property is not
"power-states" but "domain-idle-states" now.
> In addition to the entry and exit latency for idle state, also add
> residency and state-param properties. A domain idling in a state is only
> power effecient if it stays idle for a certain period in that state. The
> residency provides this minimum time for the idle state to provide power
> benefits. The state-param is a state specific u32 value that the
> platform may use for that idle state.
>
And "state-param" isn't used any more, since the patchset switched to using
arm,idle-state.
> [snip]
> +int pm_genpd_of_parse_power_states(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + int i, err = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < GENPD_MAX_NUM_STATES; i++) {
> + np = of_parse_phandle(genpd->of_node, "domain-idle-states", i);
> + if (!np)
> + break;
> +
> + err = genpd_of_get_power_state(&genpd->states[i], np);
> + if (err) {
> + pr_err
> + ("Parsing idle state node %s failed with err %d\n",
> + np->full_name, err);
> + err = -EINVAL;
I guess there should be an of_node_put here.
> + break;
> + }
> + of_node_put(np);
> + }
> +
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + genpd->state_count = i;
> + return 0;
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
