On 24-Dec-24 1:01 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 06:50:33PM +0530, Ram Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_UFS_CRYPTO
>> +/**
>> + * ufs_qcom_config_ice_allocator() - ICE core allocator configuration
>> + *
>> + * @host: pointer to qcom specific variant structure.
>> + */
>> +static void ufs_qcom_config_ice_allocator(struct ufs_qcom_host *host)
>> +{
>> + struct ufs_hba *hba = host->hba;
>> + static const uint8_t val[4] = { NUM_RX_R1W0, NUM_TX_R0W1, NUM_RX_R1W1, NUM_TX_R1W1 };
>> + u32 config;
>> +
>> + if (!is_ice_config_supported(host))
>> + return;
>
> This is the only place that is_ice_config_supported() is called, so the helper
> function seems unnecessary vs. just checking UFS_QCOM_CAP_ICE_CONFIG directly.
>
> Also, shouldn't any ICE configuration also be conditional on UFSHCD_CAP_CRYPTO?
> Just in case the ICE support got turned off for some reason.
Hi Eric,
Thanks for review. I have addressed your comments in the latest patchset.
Thanks,
Ram.
>
> - Eric
