On 20.12.2024 11:15 AM, Luca Weiss wrote: > On Fri Dec 20, 2024 at 10:39 AM CET, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 20.12.2024 9:39 AM, Luca Weiss wrote: >>> The Qualcomm SM7225 is practically identical to SM6350, so add an entry >>> using that data. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >> I think we should instead add the fallback compatible, like >> >> - enum: >> - asdf,asdf >> - const: qcom,sm7225 >> - const: qcom,sm6350 >> >> as we've done for speedbin/rename variants of SoCs lately, with separate >> entries being added for "actually different" sillicon. > > We also have currently for example sm7325=sc7280=qcm6490, would that > fall into this category as well for you, or are they more different? > > But do you think it's worth trying to also change existing platforms > like that? We also have basically the same list in > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c where we have both sm6350 and > sm7225 right now. Hm, with existing boards, I guess that's a question for dt-bindings folks Konrad
