Re: [PATCH v3 15/15] drm/msm/dpu: Enable quad-pipe for DSC and dual-DSI case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 03:49:33PM +0800, Jun Nie wrote:
> Request 4 mixers and 4 DSC for the case that both dual-DSI and DSC are
> enabled. We prefer to use 4 pipes for dual DSI case for it is power optimal
> for DSC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <jun.nie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c         |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h         |  6 ++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c      | 28 ++++++++++++++++++------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h |  3 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h   |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h      |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c        |  2 +-
>  7 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> index bad75af4e50ab..3c51c199f3e05 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static int dpu_crtc_get_lm_crc(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
>  		struct dpu_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
>  	struct dpu_crtc_mixer *m;
> -	u32 crcs[CRTC_DUAL_MIXERS];
> +	u32 crcs[CRTC_QUAD_MIXERS];
>  
>  	int rc = 0;
>  	int i;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
> index d1bb3f84fe440..ce41fb364f3db 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.h
> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ struct dpu_crtc_state {
>  
>  	bool bw_control;
>  	bool bw_split_vote;
> -	struct drm_rect lm_bounds[CRTC_DUAL_MIXERS];
> +	struct drm_rect lm_bounds[CRTC_QUAD_MIXERS];
>  
>  	uint64_t input_fence_timeout_ns;
>  
> @@ -218,10 +218,10 @@ struct dpu_crtc_state {
>  
>  	/* HW Resources reserved for the crtc */
>  	u32 num_mixers;
> -	struct dpu_crtc_mixer mixers[CRTC_DUAL_MIXERS];
> +	struct dpu_crtc_mixer mixers[CRTC_QUAD_MIXERS];
>  
>  	u32 num_ctls;
> -	struct dpu_hw_ctl *hw_ctls[CRTC_DUAL_MIXERS];
> +	struct dpu_hw_ctl *hw_ctls[CRTC_QUAD_MIXERS];
>  
>  	enum dpu_crtc_crc_source crc_source;
>  	int crc_frame_skip_count;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> index 96d06db3e4be5..6e54ddeaffacd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
>  #define MAX_PHYS_ENCODERS_PER_VIRTUAL \
>  	(MAX_H_TILES_PER_DISPLAY * NUM_PHYS_ENCODER_TYPES)
>  
> -#define MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC 2
> +#define MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC 4
>  
>  #define IDLE_SHORT_TIMEOUT	1
>  
> @@ -664,15 +664,19 @@ static struct msm_display_topology dpu_encoder_get_topology(
>  
>  	/* Datapath topology selection
>  	 *
> -	 * Dual display
> +	 * Dual display without DSC
>  	 * 2 LM, 2 INTF ( Split display using 2 interfaces)
>  	 *
> +	 * Dual display with DSC
> +	 * 4 LM, 2 INTF ( Split display using 2 interfaces)
> +	 *
>  	 * Single display
>  	 * 1 LM, 1 INTF
>  	 * 2 LM, 1 INTF (stream merge to support high resolution interfaces)
>  	 *
>  	 * Add dspps to the reservation requirements if ctm is requested
>  	 */
> +
>  	if (intf_count == 2)
>  		topology.num_lm = 2;
>  	else if (!dpu_kms->catalog->caps->has_3d_merge)
> @@ -691,10 +695,20 @@ static struct msm_display_topology dpu_encoder_get_topology(
>  		 * 2 DSC encoders, 2 layer mixers and 1 interface
>  		 * this is power optimal and can drive up to (including) 4k
>  		 * screens
> +		 * But for dual display case, we prefer 4 layer mixers. Because
> +		 * the resolution is always high in the case and 4 DSCs are more
> +		 * power optimal.
>  		 */
> -		topology.num_dsc = 2;
> -		topology.num_lm = 2;
> -		topology.num_intf = 1;
> +
> +		if (intf_count == 2) {
> +			topology.num_dsc = 4;
> +			topology.num_lm = 4;
> +			topology.num_intf = 2;
> +		} else {
> +			topology.num_dsc = 2;
> +			topology.num_lm = 2;
> +			topology.num_intf = 1;

Why is it only enabled for the DSC case? Also I'd like to point out
platforms like sm7150 or msm8998 which have only 2 DSC blocks. The
condition here needs more work to work with those platforms too.

> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	return topology;
> @@ -2195,8 +2209,8 @@ static void dpu_encoder_helper_reset_mixers(struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys_enc)
>  	struct dpu_hw_mixer_cfg mixer;
>  	int i, num_lm;
>  	struct dpu_global_state *global_state;
> -	struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_lm[2];
> -	struct dpu_hw_mixer *hw_mixer[2];
> +	struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_lm[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
> +	struct dpu_hw_mixer *hw_mixer[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC];
>  	struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctl = phys_enc->hw_ctl;
>  
>  	memset(&mixer, 0, sizeof(mixer));
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h
> index 63f09857025c2..d378a990cc0fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h
> @@ -302,7 +302,8 @@ static inline enum dpu_3d_blend_mode dpu_encoder_helper_get_3d_blend_mode(
>  
>  	/* Use merge_3d unless DSC MERGE topology is used */
>  	if (phys_enc->split_role == ENC_ROLE_SOLO &&
> -	    dpu_cstate->num_mixers == CRTC_DUAL_MIXERS &&
> +	    (dpu_cstate->num_mixers == CRTC_DUAL_MIXERS ||
> +		dpu_cstate->num_mixers == CRTC_QUAD_MIXERS) &&

Misaligned. Also isn't it enough to check that num_mixers != 1?

>  	    !dpu_encoder_use_dsc_merge(phys_enc->parent))
>  		return BLEND_3D_H_ROW_INT;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> index 3ab79092a7f25..d9cc84b081b1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  #define DPU_MAX_IMG_HEIGHT 0x3fff
>  
>  #define CRTC_DUAL_MIXERS	2

Do we still need this define?

> +#define CRTC_QUAD_MIXERS	4
>  
>  #define MAX_XIN_COUNT 16
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
> index 27ef0771da5d2..1fe21087a141a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_mdss.h
> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@
>  #endif
>  
>  #define STAGES_PER_PLANE		2
> -#define PIPES_PER_PLANE			2
>  #define PIPES_PER_STAGE			2
> +#define PIPES_PER_PLANE			(STAGES_PER_PLANE * STAGES_PER_PLANE)

This is incorrect.

>  #ifndef DPU_MAX_DE_CURVES
>  #define DPU_MAX_DE_CURVES		3
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> index 57ccb73c45683..b5c1ad2a75594 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> @@ -1474,7 +1474,7 @@ static void _dpu_plane_atomic_disable(struct drm_plane *plane)
>  		trace_dpu_plane_disable(DRMID(plane), false,
>  					pstate->pipe[i].multirect_mode);
>  
> -		if (pipe->sspp && i == 1) {
> +		if (pipe->sspp && pipe->multirect_index == DPU_SSPP_RECT_1) {

Separate change, please. Also I'm not sure how does that work with the
shared SSPP case that I pointed to in one of the previous replies.

>  			pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
>  			pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
>  
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux