On 12/18/24 10:16 PM, Ram Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
On 18-Dec-24 10:49 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:On 12/18/24 7:11 AM, Ram Kumar Dwivedi wrote:+ uint8_t val[4] = { NUM_RX_R1W0, NUM_TX_R0W1, NUM_RX_R1W1, NUM_TX_R1W1 };This array can be declared 'static const', isn't it?As this value is not modified in this function, we will declare it as const in next patchset
Why only 'const'? Why not 'static const' as everyone else does for this type of arrays? Thanks, Bart.
