On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:06:30 -0400
Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The code is using the compatible DT string to associate a reset driver
> with the actual device itself. The compatible string does not exist on
> ACPI based systems. HID is the unique identifier for a device driver
> instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> index 6be92c3..ff148764 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/iommu.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> @@ -49,6 +50,33 @@ static vfio_platform_reset_fn_t vfio_platform_lookup_reset(const char *compat,
> return reset_fn;
> }
>
This function still feels a bit sloppy
> +static int vfio_platform_acpi_probe(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
When !CONFIG_ACPI, this returns NULL
> +
> + if (acpi_disabled)
When !CONFIG_ACPI, this is defined as 1, so we'll always exit here.
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + if (!adev) {
This is really the only (ACPI_CONFIG && !acpi_disabled) error exit,
because...
> + pr_err("VFIO: ACPI companion device not found for %s\n",
> + vdev->name);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> + vdev->acpihid = acpi_device_hid(adev);
This can't actually return NULL. So the test below is unreached.
Maybe we should just conclude this function here with:
#endif
return vdev->acpihid ? 0 : -ENOENT;
which is even still a bit paranoid since it can't actually happen.
> + if (!vdev->acpihid) {
> + pr_err("VFIO: cannot find ACPI HID for %s\n",
> + vdev->name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +#else
> + return -ENOENT;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> static bool vfio_platform_has_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> {
> return vdev->of_reset ? true : false;
> @@ -547,6 +575,37 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_platform_ops = {
> .mmap = vfio_platform_mmap,
> };
>
> +int vfio_platform_of_probe(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = device_property_read_string(dev, "compatible",
> + &vdev->compat);
> + if (ret)
> + pr_err("VFIO: cannot retrieve compat for %s\n",
> + vdev->name);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * There can be two kernel build combinations. One build where
> + * ACPI is not selected in Kconfig and another one with the ACPI Kconfig.
> + *
> + * In the first case, vfio_platform_acpi_probe will return since
> + * acpi_disabled * is 1. DT user will not see any kind of messages from
^^ Previous editing cruft?
> + * ACPI.
> + *
> + * In the second case, both DT and ACPI is compiled in but the system is
> + * booting with any of these combinations.
> + *
> + * If the firmware is DT type, then acpi_disabled is 1. The ACPI probe routine
> + * terminates immediately without any messages.
> + *
> + * If the firmware is ACPI type, then acpi_disabled is 0. All other checks are
> + * valid checks. We cannot claim that this system is DT.
> + */
> int vfio_platform_probe_common(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> struct device *dev)
> {
> @@ -556,11 +615,12 @@ int vfio_platform_probe_common(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> if (!vdev)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - ret = device_property_read_string(dev, "compatible", &vdev->compat);
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_err("VFIO: cannot retrieve compat for %s\n", vdev->name);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + ret = vfio_platform_acpi_probe(vdev, dev);
> + if (ret)
> + ret = vfio_platform_of_probe(vdev, dev);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> vdev->device = dev;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> index 71ed7d1..ba9e4f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct vfio_platform_device {
> struct mutex igate;
> struct module *parent_module;
> const char *compat;
> + const char *acpihid;
> struct module *reset_module;
> struct device *device;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
