On 11/26/2024 4:05 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 09:17:40AM +0530, Yuvaraj Ranganathan wrote: >> Hi Krzysztof, >> >> I sincerely apologize for the inconvenience. I added the "Reviewed-by" >> tag without fully understanding its implications. I will remove the tag >> in the next patch series. > > First of all, please don't top-post. Put your text under the phrases > that you are responding to, not at the top of the message. Otherwise the > logic is a bit broken. > > Second, may I ask, what made you add that tag at all? I went on and > checked. Krzysztof didn't repond at all to v3 and didn't respond to v2 > of this patch. So why? > > Third, if you are unsure about what you are doing and as you seem to be > using b4 tool, please just use `b4 trailers -u`. It has its own > drawbacks so in some cases one should be careful, but at least it > doesn't invent tags on its own. > >> >> Thanks, >> Yuvaraj. >> >> On 11/22/2024 8:30 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 22/11/2024 08:43, Yuvaraj Ranganathan wrote: >>>> The qcs8300 SoC has a True Random Number Generator, add the node with >>>> the correct compatible set. >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> NAK, stop adding fake tags. It is impossible to receive above tag from >>> me written that way. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Krzysztof >> > I've added the "Reviewed-by" tag without a proper understanding as I got few comments (https://lore.kernel.org/all/4009f4ee-2c55-4a4f-8805-eafe7efc0147@xxxxxxxxxx/) on the earlier patches and tagged the reviewers under "Reviewed-by". I sincerely apologize on this and will ensure to avoid such mistakes in future. Thanks, Yuvaraj.
