On 22.11.2024 4:51 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 4:21 AM Konrad Dybcio > <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 21.11.2024 5:48 PM, Rob Clark wrote: >>> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Debugging incorrect UAPI usage tends to be a bit painful, so add a >>> helper macro to make it easier to add debug logging which can be enabled >>> at runtime via drm.debug. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >> [...] >> >>> +/* Helper for returning a UABI error with optional logging which can make >>> + * it easier for userspace to understand what it is doing wrong. >>> + */ >>> +#define UERR(err, drm, fmt, ...) \ >>> + ({ DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER((drm)->dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); -(err); }) >>> + >>> #define DBG(fmt, ...) DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(fmt"\n", ##__VA_ARGS__) >>> #define VERB(fmt, ...) if (0) DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(fmt"\n", ##__VA_ARGS__) >> >> I'm generally not a fan of adding driver-specific debug prints.. >> >> Maybe that's something that could be pushed to the drm-common layer >> or even deeper down the stack? > > Even if we had something like DRM_DBG_UABI_ERROR() I'd probably still > just #define UERR() to be a wrapper for it, since line length/wrapping > tends to be a bit of a challenge. And I have a fairly substantial > patch stack on top of this adding sparse/vm_bind support. (Debugging > that was actually the motivation for this patch.) Alright, let's not get in the way then > I noticed that xe has something similar, but slightly different shape, > in the form of XE_IOCTL_DBG().. but that kinda just moves the line > length problem into the if() conditional. (And doesn't provide the > benefit of being able to display the incorrect param.) Maybe rust comes one day and the lines will start growing vertically ;) Konrad