On 21.11.2024 7:03 PM, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote:
>
>
> On 11/21/2024 5:28 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/11/2024 12:30, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote:
>>> Add Epoch Subsystem (EPSS) L3 interconnect provider on
>>> SA8775P SoCs with multiple device support.
>>>
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> -DEFINE_QNODE(osm_l3_master, OSM_L3_MASTER_NODE, 16, OSM_L3_SLAVE_NODE);
>>> -DEFINE_QNODE(osm_l3_slave, OSM_L3_SLAVE_NODE, 16);
>>> +DEFINE_QNODE(osm_l3_master, 16, osm_l3_slave);
>>> +DEFINE_QNODE(osm_l3_slave, 16);
>>>
>>> -static const struct qcom_osm_l3_node * const osm_l3_nodes[] = {
>>> +static struct qcom_osm_l3_node * const osm_l3_nodes[] = {
>>> [MASTER_OSM_L3_APPS] = &osm_l3_master,
>>> [SLAVE_OSM_L3] = &osm_l3_slave,
>>> };
>>>
>>> -DEFINE_QNODE(epss_l3_master, OSM_L3_MASTER_NODE, 32, OSM_L3_SLAVE_NODE);
>>> -DEFINE_QNODE(epss_l3_slave, OSM_L3_SLAVE_NODE, 32);
>>> +DEFINE_QNODE(epss_l3_master, 32, epss_l3_slave);
>>> +DEFINE_QNODE(epss_l3_slave, 32);
>>>
>>> -static const struct qcom_osm_l3_node * const epss_l3_nodes[] = {
>>> +static struct qcom_osm_l3_node * const epss_l3_nodes[] = {
>>
>>
>> I think dropping const makes the code worse, not better. Commit msg does
>> not explain all these changes and I could not figure out the intention
>> (except modifying but that's just obvious).
>
> EPSS L3 on SA8775P has two instances and this requires creation of two device nodes in devicetree.
> As Interconnect framework requires a unique node id, each device node needs to have different compatible and data.
> To overcome the need of having two different compatibles and data, driver code has been modified to acquire unique node id from IDA
> and the node name is made dynamic (nodename@address).
> Updating node id and node name is not possible with const.
I think it would be better to just fix the interconnect API to do it
internally
Konrad
