Hi Dmitry, On 11/21/2024 12:38 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 at 06:02, Cheng Jiang <quic_chejiang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi Dmitry, >> >> On 11/20/2024 6:43 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 05:54:25PM +0800, Cheng Jiang wrote: >>>> Several Qualcomm projects will use the same Bluetooth chip, each >>>> focusing on different features. For instance, consumer projects >>>> prioritize the A2DP SRC feature, while IoT projects focus on the A2DP >>>> SINK feature, which may have more optimizations for coexistence when >>>> acting as a SINK. Due to the patch size, it is not feasible to include >>>> all features in a single firmware. >>>> >>>> Therefore, the 'product-variant' devicetree property is used to provide >>>> product information for the Bluetooth driver to load the appropriate >>>> firmware. >>>> >>>> If this property is not defined, the default firmware will be loaded, >>>> ensuring there are no backward compatibility issues with older >>>> devicetrees. >>>> >>>> The product-variant defines like this: >>>> 0 - 15 (16 bits) are product line specific definitions >>>> 16 - 23 (8 bits) are for the product line. >>>> 24 - 31 (8 bits) are reserved for future use, 0 currently >>> >>> Please use text strings instead of encoding this information into random >>> integers and then using just 3 bits out of 32. >> Ack. Originally intended to make it more flexible for future use. It can be >> text strings for current requirement. > > No, fixed-format data isn't flexible. Fine-grained properties are. > Please define exactly what is necessary rather than leaving empty > holes "for future expansion".= Got it. Thank you for the guidance. > >>> >>>> >>>> |---------------------------------------------------------------------| >>>> | 32 Bits | >>>> |---------------------------------------------------------------------| >>>> | 31 - 24 (bits) | 23 - 16 (bits) | 15 - 0 (16 bits) | >>>> |---------------------------------------------------------------------| >>>> | Reserved | 0: default | 0: default | >>>> | | 1: CE | | >>>> | | 2: IoT | | >>>> | | 3: Auto | | >>>> | | 4: Reserved | | >>>> |---------------------------------------------------------------------| >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Cheng Jiang <quic_chejiang@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> .../bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml | 6 ++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml >>>> index 7bb68311c609..9019fe7bcdc6 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/bluetooth/qualcomm-bluetooth.yaml >>>> @@ -110,6 +110,12 @@ properties: >>>> description: >>>> boot firmware is incorrectly passing the address in big-endian order >>>> >>>> + qcom,product-variant: >>>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 >>>> + description: >>>> + specify the product information for driver to load the appropriate firmware >>> >>> DT describes hardware. Is this a hardware property? >> >> It has been added to identify the firmware image for the platform. The driver >> parses it, and then the rampatch is selected from a specify directory. Currently, >> there is a 'firmware-name' parameter, but it is only used to specify the NVM >> (config) file. We also need to specify the rampatch (TLV file). >> >> >> Can we re-use the "firmware-name"? add two segments like the following? >> firmware-name = "rampatch_xx.tlv", "nvm_xx.bin"; > > I think this is the better solution Ack. Will submit a new change based on this. > >> >> Or add a new property to specify the rampatch file? >> rampatch-name = "rampatch_xx.tlv"; >> >>> >>>> + >>>> + >>>> required: >>>> - compatible >>>> >>>> -- >>>> 2.25.1 >>>> >>> >> > >
