Re: [PATCH RFC 6/8] drm/msm: adreno: enable GMU bandwidth for A740 and A750

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15/11/2024 08:33, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 04:48:32PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
Now all the DDR bandwidth voting via the GPU Management Unit (GMU)
is in place, let's declare the Bus Control Modules (BCMs) and

s/let's //g

it's parameters in the GPU info struct and add the GMU_BW_VOTE
quirk to enable it.

Can we define a function that checks for info.bcm[0].name isntead of
adding a quirk?

Probably, I'll need ideas to how design this better, perhaps a simple
capability bitfield in a6xx_info ?
There's other feature that are lacking, like ACD or BCL which are not supported
on all a6xx/a7xx gpus.



Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
index 0c560e84ad5a53bb4e8a49ba4e153ce9cf33f7ae..014a24256b832d8e03fe06a6516b5348a5c0474a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
@@ -1379,7 +1379,8 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
  		.inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
  		.quirks = ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_CACHED_COHERENT |
  			  ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_HW_APRIV |
-			  ADRENO_QUIRK_PREEMPTION,
+			  ADRENO_QUIRK_PREEMPTION |
+			  ADRENO_QUIRK_GMU_BW_VOTE,
  		.init = a6xx_gpu_init,
  		.zapfw = "a740_zap.mdt",
  		.a6xx = &(const struct a6xx_info) {
@@ -1388,6 +1389,16 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
  			.pwrup_reglist = &a7xx_pwrup_reglist,
  			.gmu_chipid = 0x7020100,
  			.gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
+			.bcm = {
+				[0] = { .name = "SH0", .buswidth = 16 },
+				[1] = { .name = "MC0", .buswidth = 4 },
+				[2] = {
+					.name = "ACV",
+					.fixed = true,
+					.perfmode = BIT(3),
+					.perfmode_bw = 16500000,

Is it a platform property or GPU / GMU property? Can expect that there
might be several SoCs having the same GPU, but different perfmode_bw
entry?

I presume this is SoC specific ? But today the XXX_build_bw_table() are
already SoC specific, so where should this go ?

Downstream specifies this in the adreno-gpulist.h, which is the equivalent
here.

Neil


+				},
+			},
  		},
  		.address_space_size = SZ_16G,
  		.preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
@@ -1424,7 +1435,8 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
  		.inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
  		.quirks = ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_CACHED_COHERENT |
  			  ADRENO_QUIRK_HAS_HW_APRIV |
-			  ADRENO_QUIRK_PREEMPTION,
+			  ADRENO_QUIRK_PREEMPTION |
+			  ADRENO_QUIRK_GMU_BW_VOTE,
  		.init = a6xx_gpu_init,
  		.zapfw = "gen70900_zap.mbn",
  		.a6xx = &(const struct a6xx_info) {
@@ -1432,6 +1444,16 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
  			.pwrup_reglist = &a7xx_pwrup_reglist,
  			.gmu_chipid = 0x7090100,
  			.gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
+			.bcm = {
+				[0] = { .name = "SH0", .buswidth = 16 },
+				[1] = { .name = "MC0", .buswidth = 4 },
+				[2] = {
+					.name = "ACV",
+					.fixed = true,
+					.perfmode = BIT(2),
+					.perfmode_bw = 10687500,
+				},
+			},
  		},
  		.address_space_size = SZ_16G,
  		.preempt_record_size = 3572 * SZ_1K,

--
2.34.1







[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux