On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 01:15:41PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 12:23:57PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > On 3.11.2024 4:37 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>
> > > static const struct of_device_id qcom_scm_qseecom_allowlist[] __maybe_unused = {
> > > - { .compatible = "dell,xps13-9345" },
> > > - { .compatible = "lenovo,flex-5g" },
> > > - { .compatible = "lenovo,thinkpad-t14s" },
> > > - { .compatible = "lenovo,thinkpad-x13s", },
> > > - { .compatible = "lenovo,yoga-slim7x" },
> > > - { .compatible = "microsoft,arcata", },
> > > - { .compatible = "microsoft,romulus13", },
> > > - { .compatible = "microsoft,romulus15", },
> > > - { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-primus" },
> > > - { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-crd" },
> > > - { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-qcp" },
> > > + { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x", .data = (void *)true },
> > > + { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp", .data = (void *)true },
> > > + { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100", .data = (void *)true },
> > > { }
> > > };
> >
> > + Steev I think you had some unhappy machine
> >
> > And maybe 8180 Primus?
>
> I have a sc8280xp crd here where variables can only be read, not stored
> (e.g. similar to the Lenovo Yoga C630). In it's current configuration
> the machine boots from UFS and this could possibly be related to how it
> has been provisioned, but this is the reason why "qcom,sc8280xp-crd" is
> not already in the above list.
Ok, so we need to add RO support first. Good point (that was pending for
c630 too, as you remember).
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
