On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 09:36:46AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/11/2024 19:14, Melody Olvera wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/1/2024 10:19 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> Add nodes for IPCC mailbox, SMP2P for ADSP, AOSS and the ADSP remoteproc
> >> PAS loader (compatible with SM8550).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi | 140 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 140 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi
> >> index 98ab82caa007ee63c395a3ce0f517e2bbeb0aecb..eb826b154dcb2d8165426ba2225548efd7547da8 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi
> > [...]
> >>
> >> @@ -538,6 +566,17 @@ gcc: clock-controller@100000 {
> >> #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> >> };
> >>
> >> + ipcc: mailbox@406000 {
> >> + compatible = "qcom,sm8750-ipcc", "qcom,ipcc";
> >> + reg = <0 0x00406000 0 0x1000>;
> >
> > nit: unsure, but should thse be 0x0?
>
> No, all recent upstream DTSI files nodes use simplified 0, because it is
> shorter. Maybe except few cases, but then these could be corrected instead.
I think most of the files (including x1e80100.dtsi) use a mixture of 0x0
and 0 here. I have been told several times to use 0x0 all the time.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
