Re: [PATCH v3 05/23] drm/msm/dpu: move resource allocation to CRTC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 12:37:03PM -0700, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/16/2024 6:21 PM, Jessica Zhang wrote:
> > From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > All resource allocation is centered around the LMs. Then other blocks
> > (except DSCs) are allocated basing on the LMs that was selected, and LM
> > powers up the CRTC rather than the encoder.
> > 
> > Moreover if at some point the driver supports encoder cloning,
> > allocating resources from the encoder will be incorrect, as all clones
> > will have different encoder IDs, while LMs are to be shared by these
> > encoders.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > [quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx: Refactored resource allocation for CDM]
> > Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [quic_jesszhan@xxxxxxxxxxx: Changed to grabbing exising global state]
> > Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c    |  86 ++++++++++++
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 201 +++++++++++-----------------
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.h |  19 +++
> >   3 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> <Snip>
> 
> > -	/* See dpu_encoder_get_topology, we only support 2:2:1 topology */
> > +	/* We only support 2 DSC mode (with 2 LM and 1 INTF) */
> >   	if (dpu_enc->dsc)
> > -		num_dsc = 2;
> > +		topology->num_dsc += 2;
> > -	return (num_dsc > 0) && (num_dsc > intf_count);
> > -}
> 
> I dont recall the context of replacing num_dsc = 2 with num_dsc += 2
> and its not documented.
> 
> <Snip>
> 
> > +	/* We only support 2 DSC mode (with 2 LM and 1 INTF) */
> > +	if (dpu_enc->dsc)
> > +		num_dsc += 2;
> > -	return topology;
> > +	return (num_dsc > 0) && (num_dsc > num_intf);
> >   }
> 
> Same here
> 
> This should not break anything with current code. We could land it the way
> it is as this was the version which was last tested and post a follow up if
> this was not right. Something to be documented though, hope this note serves
> that purpose. Rest of the change LGTM,

As this is supposed to be a refactor, I'll land it as num_dsc = 2 and
let Jessica fix it in the followup patches. I think it's better this
way.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux