On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 02:45:37PM +0800, shaojiedong wrote: Dmitry asked you to not send multiple versions of a patch within 24 hours, and you seem to have sent the next version 5 hours later... Perhaps you are unaware that you are Cc'ing the public list (linux-arm-msm@)? Please do get your patches reviewed on the internal list before sending more. > free_pages() performs a parameter null check inside > therefore remove double zero check here. > It seems correct that the check is unnecessary, but is the impact of this change worth sending and getting four versions reviewed? > Signed-off-by: Shaojie Dong <quic_shaojied@xxxxxxxxxxx> The author of the commit doesn't match the signed-off-by. > --- > Changes in v3: > - EDITME: fit the git setup and simplify commit description Drop the EDITME: from the changelog. > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241025-upstream_branch-v2-1-072009bfa7d0@xxxxxxxxxxx > > Changes in v2: > - EDITME: describe what is new in this series revision. > - EDITME: use bulletpoints and terse descriptions. This wasn't updated at all. Regards, Bjorn > - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241025-upstream_branch-v1-1-4829506c7cdb@xxxxxxxxxxx > --- > arch/um/kernel/skas/mmu.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/skas/mmu.c b/arch/um/kernel/skas/mmu.c > index d3fb506d5bd6084046cf5903c629432cd42b5ab3..0eb5a1d3ba70134f75d9b2af18544fca7248c6d6 100644 > --- a/arch/um/kernel/skas/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/um/kernel/skas/mmu.c > @@ -46,8 +46,7 @@ int init_new_context(struct task_struct *task, struct mm_struct *mm) > return 0; > > out_free: > - if (new_id->stack != 0) > - free_pages(new_id->stack, ilog2(STUB_DATA_PAGES)); > + free_pages(new_id->stack, ilog2(STUB_DATA_PAGES)); > out: > return ret; > } > > --- > base-commit: fd21fa4a912ebbf8a6a341c31d8456f61e7d4170 > change-id: 20241025-upstream_branch-06a9ea92948d > > Best regards, > -- > shaojiedong <quic_shaojied@xxxxxxxxxxx> >
