Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] drm/msm/dpu: move pstate->pipe initialization to dpu_plane_atomic_check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/28/2024 3:46 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 12:00:20PM -0700, Abhinav Kumar wrote:


On 10/24/2024 5:20 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
In preparation for virtualized planes support, move pstate->pipe
initialization from dpu_plane_reset() to dpu_plane_atomic_check(). In
case of virtual planes the plane's pipe will not be known up to the
point of atomic_check() callback.


I had R-bed this in v5. Did anything change in v6?

No, nothing. I'm sorry for forgetting to run `b4 trailers -u`.

But one comment below.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
index 37faf5b238b0..725c9a5826fd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
@@ -797,13 +797,22 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
   	uint32_t max_linewidth;
   	unsigned int rotation;
   	uint32_t supported_rotations;
-	const struct dpu_sspp_cfg *pipe_hw_caps = pstate->pipe.sspp->cap;
-	const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks *sblk = pstate->pipe.sspp->cap->sblk;
+	const struct dpu_sspp_cfg *pipe_hw_caps;
+	const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks *sblk;
   	if (new_plane_state->crtc)
   		crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state,
   							   new_plane_state->crtc);
+	pipe->sspp = dpu_rm_get_sspp(&kms->rm, pdpu->pipe);
+	r_pipe->sspp = NULL;
+
+	if (!pipe->sspp)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	pipe_hw_caps = pipe->sspp->cap;
+	sblk = pipe->sspp->cap->sblk;
+
   	min_scale = FRAC_16_16(1, sblk->maxupscale);
   	ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state(new_plane_state, crtc_state,
   						  min_scale,

Do you think it will be better to move the get_sspp() call after the
drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state()?

I'd say, it makes no difference. I'll check your suggestion if I have to
send another iteration.


Ok, its a minor comment, I am fine with this change otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>

If you do need to push another version, you can explore that.


@@ -820,7 +829,6 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
   	pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
   	r_pipe->multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
   	r_pipe->multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
-	r_pipe->sspp = NULL;
   	pstate->stage = DPU_STAGE_0 + pstate->base.normalized_zpos;
   	if (pstate->stage >= pdpu->catalog->caps->max_mixer_blendstages) {
@@ -1286,7 +1294,6 @@ static void dpu_plane_reset(struct drm_plane *plane)
   {
   	struct dpu_plane *pdpu;
   	struct dpu_plane_state *pstate;
-	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms = _dpu_plane_get_kms(plane);
   	if (!plane) {
   		DPU_ERROR("invalid plane\n");
@@ -1308,16 +1315,6 @@ static void dpu_plane_reset(struct drm_plane *plane)
   		return;
   	}
-	/*
-	 * Set the SSPP here until we have proper virtualized DPU planes.
-	 * This is the place where the state is allocated, so fill it fully.
-	 */
-	pstate->pipe.sspp = dpu_rm_get_sspp(&dpu_kms->rm, pdpu->pipe);
-	pstate->pipe.multirect_index = DPU_SSPP_RECT_SOLO;
-	pstate->pipe.multirect_mode = DPU_SSPP_MULTIRECT_NONE;
-
-	pstate->r_pipe.sspp = NULL;
-
   	__drm_atomic_helper_plane_reset(plane, &pstate->base);
   }






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux