Quoting Elliot Berman (2024-10-28 11:44:57) > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c > index 2328ca58bba6..2d7b6efc8743 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c > @@ -79,6 +79,14 @@ struct psci_0_1_function_ids get_psci_0_1_function_ids(void) > static u32 psci_cpu_suspend_feature; > static bool psci_system_reset2_supported; > > +struct psci_reset_param { > + const char *mode; > + u32 reset_type; > + u32 cookie; > +}; > +static struct psci_reset_param *psci_reset_params; > +static size_t num_psci_reset_params; These two can be __ro_after_init > + > static inline bool psci_has_ext_power_state(void) > { > return psci_cpu_suspend_feature & > @@ -305,9 +313,38 @@ static int get_set_conduit_method(const struct device_node *np) > return 0; > } > > +static void psci_vendor_system_reset2(unsigned long action, void *data) Can 'data' simply be 'const char *cmd' instead? And can 'action' be dropped? It isn't used in this function. > +{ > + const char *cmd = data; > + unsigned long ret; > + size_t i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < num_psci_reset_params; i++) { > + if (!strcmp(psci_reset_params[i].mode, cmd)) { > + ret = invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_FN_NATIVE(1_1, SYSTEM_RESET2), > + psci_reset_params[i].reset_type, > + psci_reset_params[i].cookie, 0); > + /* > + * if vendor reset fails, log it and fall back to > + * architecture reset types > + */ > + pr_err("failed to perform reset \"%s\": %ld\n", cmd, > + (long)ret); return? because we're not going to try another one, right?