On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06/14, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> + rpmcc: clock-controller {
>> + compatible = "qcom,rpmcc-apq8660", "qcom,rpmcc";
>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>> + };
>
> This driver isn't merged yet, but ok.
It's there because it is there in
arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
>> +
>> + pm8901-regulators {
>
> I'd rather have regulators@8901 and regulators@8058. That way the
> node name is generic per ePAPR suggestions.
Seems impossible if I should conclude the other discussion...
>> + pm8058_mvs: mvs {};
>
> pm8901_mvs?
Ooops fixing.
>> + pm8058-regulators {
>> + compatible = "qcom,rpm-pm8058-regulators";
>> +
>> + pm8058_l0: l0 {};
>> + pm8058_l1: l1 {};
>> + pm8058_l2: l2 {};
>> + pm8058_l3: l3 {};
>> + pm8058_l4: l4 {};
>> + pm8058_l5: l5 {};
>> + pm8058_l6: l6 {};
>> + pm8058_l7: l7 {};
>> + pm8058_l8: l8 {};
>> + pm8058_l9: l9 {};
>> + pm8058_l10: l10 {};
>> + pm8058_l11: l11 {};
>> + pm8058_l12: l12 {};
>> + pm8058_l13: l13 {};
>> + pm8058_l14: l14 {};
>> + pm8058_l15: l15 {};
>> + pm8058_l16: l16 {};
>> + pm8058_l17: l17 {};
>> + pm8058_l18: l18 {};
>> + pm8058_l19: l19 {};
>> + pm8058_l20: l20 {};
>> + pm8058_l21: l21 {};
>> + pm8058_l22: l22 {};
>> + pm8058_l23: l23 {};
>> + pm8058_l24: l24 {};
>> + pm8058_l25: l25 {};
>> +
>> + pm8058_s0: s0 {};
>> + pm8058_s1: s1 {};
>
> Just leave these out? RPM shouldn't be touching s0 or s1.
Really? The msm-3.4 tree does:
/* RPM early regulator constraints */
static struct rpm_regulator_init_data
rpm_regulator_early_init_data[] = {
/* ID a_on pd ss min_uV max_uV init_ip freq */
RPM_SMPS(PM8058_S0, 0, 1, 1, 500000, 1325000, SMPS_HMIN, 1p60),
RPM_SMPS(PM8058_S1, 0, 1, 1, 500000, 1250000, SMPS_HMIN, 1p60),
Are you sure you don't mean s0+s1 on PM8901 (which I left out)?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
