Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] dt-bindings: media: camss: Add qcom,sdm670-camss

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/10/2024 11:09, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 01/10/2024 07:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> +  reg-names:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - const: csiphy0
>>> +      - const: csiphy1
>>> +      - const: csiphy2
>>> +      - const: vfe0
>>> +      - const: csid0
>>> +      - const: vfe1
>>> +      - const: csid1
>>> +      - const: vfe_lite
>>> +      - const: csid2
>> Why this order is so different than all others? This is supposed to
>> match other devices. Look at sdm845 for example.
> 
> These are appearing in address order, which is preferred over reg-name 
> ordering AFAIU.

First time I hear about such rule. Where is this ordering preference
documented? We always ask to keep the same order in each file.


Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux