On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 06:33:49PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > How do you think about a wording variant like the following? > The result from a call of the function “devm_kzalloc” was passed to > a subsequent function call without checking for a null pointer before > (according to a memory allocation failure). > Thus return directly after a failed devm_kzalloc() call. Feel free to ignore Markus, he has a long history of sending unhelpful review comments and continues to ignore repeated requests to stop.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
