On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 03:14:24PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 05/12, Andy Gross wrote:
> > This patch converts the Qualcomm SCM firmware driver into a platform
> > driver.
>
> And introduces clk enable/disable + rate setting logic because
> the firmware uses crypto clks during some scm calls.
I'll make the commit message more descriptive of the change.
> >
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver qcom_scm_driver = {
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "qcom_scm",
> > + .of_match_table = qcom_scm_dt_match,
> > + },
> > + .probe = qcom_scm_probe,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int __init qcom_scm_init(void)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *np, *parent;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + np = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, qcom_scm_dt_match, NULL);
>
> Why can't we find a node called "firmware" in the root of the
> tree? That would be clearer what's going on here, and avoid the
> need to do the of_get_next_parent() dance, which just feels
> awkward.
Well I had reworked it previously to avoid calling of_platform_populate on
anyone with a firmware node. I guess what I can do is find the firmware node
and then only populate if I get a match starting from the firmware node itself.
That satisfies both comments.
> > +
> > + if (!np)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + parent = of_get_next_parent(np);
> > + ret = of_platform_populate(parent, qcom_scm_dt_match, NULL, NULL);
> > +
> > + of_node_put(parent);
> > +
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return platform_driver_register(&qcom_scm_driver);
> > +}
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
