Hi,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 8:53 PM Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >> @@ -1132,6 +1134,12 @@ static int spi_geni_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> if (ret)
> >> return ret;
> >>
> >> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, spi_geni_release_dma_chan, mas);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "Unable to add action.\n");
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
> >
> > Use dev_err_probe() to simplify.
> >
> > ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, spi_geni_release_dma_chan, mas);
> > if (ret)
> > return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Unable to add action.\n");
>
> It seems that if it only return -ENOMEM or 0, using dev_err_probe() has
> not not much value for many community maintainers.
While I won't insist, it still has some value to use dev_err_probe()
as I talked about in commit 7065f92255bb ("driver core: Clarify that
dev_err_probe() is OK even w/out -EPROBE_DEFER").
-Doug
