On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 04:49:31PM GMT, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 10:27:24PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 08:23:39PM GMT, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 4:04 PM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2024 at 02:20:22PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > Remove the regulator-always-on property from the ones that used to be > > > > > implicitly needed by the on-board WCN6855 now that its PMU is modeled in > > > > > device-tree. > > > > > What makes you think s10b is only used by wcn6855? > > > > > > I didn't say that. It's used by many components but they seem to be > > > all described in DT. But I get it, the schematics show it in so many > > > places, it would be risky to not keep it on. > > > > Well, that depends on the consumers. If all consumers are good and > > voting, then it should be safe. > > Right. But in this case, not all consumers are described in DT (e.g. > ddr) and this is effectively an always-on rail. Ack. -- With best wishes Dmitry
