On 06/09/2024 17:32, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote:
>
> On 9/4/2024 11:52 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 04/09/2024 19:12, Raviteja Laggyshetty wrote:
>>> +
>>> static const struct qcom_osm_l3_desc epss_l3_l3_vote = {
>>> .nodes = epss_l3_nodes,
>>> .num_nodes = ARRAY_SIZE(epss_l3_nodes),
>>> @@ -284,6 +307,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id osm_l3_of_match[] = {
>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-osm-l3", .data = &osm_l3 },
>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-osm-l3", .data = &osm_l3 },
>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-epss-l3", .data = &epss_l3_perf_state },
>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-epss-l3-cl0",
>>> + .data = &epss_l3_perf_state },
>> Don't grow it but express compatibility.
> ok. Will rename compatible from "qcom,sa8775p-epss-l3-cl0" to "qcom,sa8775p-epss-l3".
This won't solve the problem. You still grow the table, right?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
