On 9/4/2024 6:17 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 04/09/2024 14:27, Nikunj Kela wrote: >> On 9/3/2024 11:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 03:02:33PM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote: >>>> Add compatible for the cpufreq engine representing support on SA8255p. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml >>>> index 1e9797f96410..84865e553c8b 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.yaml >>>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ properties: >>>> items: >>>> - enum: >>>> - qcom,qdu1000-cpufreq-epss >>>> + - qcom,sa8255p-cpufreq-epss >>>> - qcom,sa8775p-cpufreq-epss >>>> - qcom,sc7280-cpufreq-epss >>>> - qcom,sc8280xp-cpufreq-epss >>>> @@ -206,6 +207,21 @@ allOf: >>>> interrupt-names: >>>> minItems: 2 >>>> >>>> + - if: >>>> + properties: >>>> + compatible: >>>> + contains: >>>> + enum: >>>> + - qcom,sa8255p-cpufreq-epss >>>> + then: >>>> + properties: >>>> + reg: >>>> + minItems: 2 >>>> + maxItems: 2 >>>> + >>>> + reg-names: >>>> + minItems: 2 >>>> + maxItems: 2 >>> What about interrupts? You need to constrain each of such lists. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Krzysztof >> Interrupts are not required, I still need to put constraints for > It's irrelevant whether they are required or not. Each property should > be narrowed. So evenif we don't use interrupts property in our DT(patch#21), we need to mention interrupts here? You suggest we put interrupts with maxItems: 0? I wonder why SA8775p compatible is not in constraint list.. >> interrupts? BTW, there is no if block for SA8775p binding in this file. > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
