Re: remove the dma_set_{max_seg_size,seg_boundary,min_align_mask} return value v2
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
: Re: remove the dma_set_{max_seg_size,seg_boundary,min_align_mask} return value v2
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date
: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 06:24:12 +0200
Cc
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dmaengine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
yq1v7zkdu3s.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com
>
References
: <
20240824034925.1163244-1-hch@lst.de
> <
yq1v7zkdu3s.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com
>
User-agent
: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Thanks, I've pulled the series into the dma-mapping for-next tree now.
References
:
remove the dma_set_{max_seg_size,seg_boundary,min_align_mask} return value v2
From:
Christoph Hellwig
Re: remove the dma_set_{max_seg_size,seg_boundary,min_align_mask} return value v2
From:
Martin K. Petersen
Prev by Date:
Re: [PATCH 18/22] dt-bindings: spi: document support for SA8255p
Next by Date:
Re: [PATCH V5 1/1] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5: Get crash reason from specific SMEM partition
Previous by thread:
Re: remove the dma_set_{max_seg_size,seg_boundary,min_align_mask} return value v2
Next by thread:
[REGRESSION] firmware: qcom: scm: smc: switch to using the SCM allocator
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux ARM Kernel]
[Linux ARM]
[Linux Omap]
[Fedora ARM]
[Linux for Sparc]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Bugtraq]
[Linux MIPS]
[ECOS]
[Asterisk Internet PBX]
[Linux API]