On 28/08/2024 09:42, Lijuan Gao wrote:
>
>
> 在 8/28/2024 2:23 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:02:15AM +0800, Lijuan Gao wrote:
>>> Add initial DTSI for QCS615 SoC. It includes base description
>>> of CPUs, interrupt-controller and cpu idle on Qualcomm QCS615
>>> platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lijuan Gao <quic_lijuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi | 449 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 449 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..cf7aaa7f6131
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,449 @@
>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>>> +
>>> +/ {
>>> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>>> +
>>
>> No need for blank line.
> Well noted. Will update in the next patch.
>>
>>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>>> +
>>> + chosen { };
>>
>> Drop, redundant.
> Well noted. Will update in the next patch.
>>
>>> +
>>> + clocks {
>>> + xo_board: xo-board {
>>
>> xo-clk? xo-board-clk?
>>
>> But if board, this does not sound like part of SoC. See other files how
>> they do it.
>>
> Other files also added ‘xo_board’. The ‘xo_board’ is the clock that will
No. Don't use 10yo code as example.
> be used by other SoC nodes, such as rpmhcc. Currently, the node can be
> deleted as no one is using it.
I don't think you understood the problem. This is not the property of
SoC. We talked about this many times. DTS coding style has even explicit
guideline for this. Your own go/upstream (which is quite well written
and complete) probably as well. Did you check it? If there is no such,
extend it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
