On 30.07.24 17:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 30/07/2024 16:10, djakov@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Georgi Djakov <djakov@xxxxxxxxxx>
The virtual interconnect providers do not have their own IO address space,
but this is not documented in the DT schema and the following warnings are
reported by dtbs_check:
sc8180x-lenovo-flex-5g.dtb: interconnect-camnoc-virt: 'reg' is a required property
sc8180x-lenovo-flex-5g.dtb: interconnect-mc-virt: 'reg' is a required property
sc8180x-lenovo-flex-5g.dtb: interconnect-qup-virt: 'reg' is a required property
sc8180x-primus.dtb: interconnect-camnoc-virt: 'reg' is a required property
sc8180x-primus.dtb: interconnect-mc-virt: 'reg' is a required property
sc8180x-primus.dtb: interconnect-qup-virt: 'reg' is a required property
Fix this by adding them to the list of compatibles that do not require
the reg property.
So I guess we are giving up on
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530162454.51708-4-vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx/
?
Thanks for the pointer! That approach is fine too, but i was expecting
a re-send and then later completely forgot about it. I have a slight
preference towards my patch, because it is more compact, but i can also
revive Vinod's patch if you think that it would be a better pattern to
follow in the long term.
BR,
Georgi
