On 2024/8/22 15:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 11:41:18PM -0700, Mao Jinlong wrote:qcom,qmi-id is the instance id used by qmi API to communicate with remote processor. Signed-off-by: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- .../bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-remote-etm.yaml | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-remote-etm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-remote-etm.yaml index 4fd5752978cd..27e5f18bfedf 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-remote-etm.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-remote-etm.yaml @@ -20,6 +20,13 @@ properties: compatible: const: qcom,coresight-remote-etm+ qcom,qmi-id:+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 + description: + This id is used by qmi API to communicate with remote processor for + enabling and disabling remote etm. Each processor has its unique instance + id. + out-ports: $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports additionalProperties: false @@ -31,6 +38,7 @@ properties:required:- compatible + - qcom,qmi-idThat's an ABI break. Best regards, Krzysztof
Hi Krzysztof, Sorry, I didn't get your point. Could you please share more details ? Thanks Jinlong Mao
