Re: [PATCH v24 12/34] ASoC: doc: Add documentation for SOC USB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/1/2024 3:17 AM, Wesley Cheng wrote:
With the introduction of the soc-usb driver, add documentation highlighting
details on how to utilize the new driver and how it interacts with
different components in USB SND and ASoC.  It provides examples on how to
implement the drivers that will need to be introduced in order to enable
USB audio offloading.

Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---

(...)

+
+One potential use case would be to support USB audio offloading, which is
+an implementation that allows for an external DSP on the SoC to handle the
+transfer of audio data over the USB bus.  This would let the main
+processor to stay in lower power modes for longer durations.  The following

*duration

(...)

+
+In order to account for conditions where driver or device existence is
+not guaranteed, USB SND exposes snd_usb_rediscover_devices() to resend the
+connect events for any identified USB audio interfaces.  Consider the
+the following situtation:

*situation

+USB Offload Related Kcontrols
+=============================
+Details
+-------
+A set of kcontrols can be utilized by applications to help select the proper sound
+devices to enable USB audio offloading.  SOC USB exposes the get_offload_dev()
+callback that designs can use to ensure that the proper indices are returned to the
+application.

At the moment I only see getter below, how does application set it?

+
+Implementation
+--------------
+
+**Example:**
+
+  **Sound Cards**:
+
+	::
+
+	  0 [SM8250MTPWCD938]: sm8250 - SM8250-MTP-WCD9380-WSA8810-VA-D
+						SM8250-MTP-WCD9380-WSA8810-VA-DMIC
+	  1 [Seri           ]: USB-Audio - Plantronics Blackwire 3225 Seri
+						Plantronics Plantronics Blackwire 3225 Seri at usb-xhci-hcd.1.auto-1.1, full sp
+	  2 [C320M          ]: USB-Audio - Plantronics C320-M
+                      Plantronics Plantronics C320-M at usb-xhci-hcd.1.auto-1.2, full speed
+
+  **USB Sound Card** - card#1:
+
+	::
+
+	  USB Offload Playback Route PCM#0        -1, -1 (range -1->255)
+
+  **USB Sound Card** - card#2:
+
+	::
+
+	  USB Offload Playback Route PCM#0        0, 1 (range -1->255)
+
+The above example shows a scenario where the system has one ASoC platform card
+(card#0) and two USB sound devices connected (card#1 and card#2).  When reading
+the available kcontrols for each USB audio device, the following kcontrol lists
+the mapped offload path for the specific device:
+
+	"USB Offload Playback Route#*"
+
+The kcontrol is indexed, because a USB audio device could potentially have
+several PCM devices.  The above kcontrols are defined as:
+
+  - ``USB Offload Playback Route PCM`` **(R)**: Returns the ASoC platform sound
+	card and PCM device index.  The output "0, 1" (card index, PCM device index)
+	signifies that there is an available offload path for the USB SND device
+	through card#0-PCM device#1.  If "-1, -1" is seen, then no offload path is
+	available for the USB SND device.
+

That's better, although I'm still not convinced end users care where offload happens.

Few questions though, so I'm sure I understand how it works:
Does "0, 1" in this case means that if you try to open device 1 on card 0, you won't be able to do it, because it is offloading USB?

In case it is "-1, -1" is there a chance that it can change?






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux