Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/14] net: stmmac: convert stmmac "pcs" to phylink

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 11:45:21AM GMT, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is version 3 of the series switching stmmac to use phylink PCS
> isntead of going behind phylink's back.
> 
> Changes since version 2:
> - Adopted some of Serge's feedback.
> - New patch: adding ethqos_pcs_set_inband() for qcom-ethqos so we
>   have one place to modify for AN control rather than many.
> - New patch: pass the stmmac_priv structure into the pcs_set_ane()
>   method.
> - New patch: remove pcs_get_adv_lp() early, as this is only for TBI
>   and RTBI, support for which we dropped in an already merged patch.
> - Provide stmmac_pcs structure to encapsulate the pointer to
>   stmmac_priv, PCS MMIO address pointer and phylink_pcs structure.
> - Restructure dwmac_pcs_config() so we can eventually share code
>   with dwmac_ctrl_ane().
> - New patch: move dwmac_ctrl_ane() into stmmac_pcs.c, and share code.
> - New patch: pass the stmmac_pcs structure into dwmac_pcs_isr().
> - New patch: similar to Serge's patch, rename the PCS registers, but
>   use STMMAC_PCS_ as the prefix rather than just PCS_ which is too
>   generic.
> - New patch: incorporate "net: stmmac: Activate Inband/PCS flag
>   based on the selected iface" from Serge.
> 
> On the subject of whether we should have two PCS instances, I
> experimented with that and have now decided against it. Instead,
> dwmac_pcs_config() now tests whether we need to fiddle with the
> PCS control register or not.
> 
> Note that I prefer not to have multiple layers of indirection, but
> instead prefer a library-style approach, which is why I haven't
> turned the PCS support into something that's self contained with
> a method in the MAC driver to grab the RGSMII status.
> 

Tested-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx> # sa8775p-ride

Note, I also tested with setting sa8775p-ride to:

    managed = "in-band-status";

and noticed no issues either when signalling was done in-band. Just
highlighting that since there's some comments referencing the lack of
in-band signalling with dwmac-qcom-ethqos usage in the series, but it
seems that's ok in either case.

I know there's the "sa8775p-ride-r3.dts" that was recently added,
running with "OCSGMII" (hacked up 2.5GHz SGMII IIUC), I can't test that
since I don't have that hardware. I think some of the remaining
interesting bits in the dwmac-qcom-ethqos driver are to handle that
(like the usage of ethqos_pcs_set_inband).

Thanks,
Andrew





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux