Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Work around SDM845 Adreno SMMU w/ 16K pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 10:37:48AM GMT, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> SDM845's Adreno SMMU is unique in that it actually advertizes support
> for 16K (and 32M) pages, which doesn't hold for newer SoCs.
> 
> This however, seems either broken in the hardware implementation, the
> hypervisor middleware that abstracts the SMMU, or there's a bug in the
> Linux kernel somewhere down the line that nobody managed to track down.
> 
> Booting SDM845 with 16K page sizes and drm/msm results in:
> 
> *** gpu fault: ttbr0=0000000000000000 iova=000100000000c000 dir=READ
> type=TRANSLATION source=CP (0,0,0,0)
> 
> right after loading the firmware. The GPU then starts spitting out
> illegal intstruction errors, as it's quite obvious that it got a
> bogus pointer.
> 
> Hide 16K support on SDM845's Adreno SMMU to work around this.
> 
> Reported-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> There's a mismatch in sender/committer addresses but that's "fine":
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/2024072734-scenic-unwilling-71ea@gregkh/
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> index 36c6b36ad4ff..d25825c05817 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> @@ -338,6 +338,15 @@ static int qcom_smmu_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int qcom_adreno_smmuv2_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +	/* SDM845 Adreno SMMU advertizes 16K pages support, but something is broken */
> +	if (of_device_is_compatible(smmu->dev->of_node, "qcom,sdm845-smmu-v2"))
> +		smmu->features &= ~ARM_SMMU_FEAT_FMT_AARCH64_16K;

Shouldn't we hide that uncoditionally as it's likely that none of v2
Adreno SMMUs support 16k pages?

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static void qcom_smmu_write_s2cr(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int idx)
>  {
>  	struct arm_smmu_s2cr *s2cr = smmu->s2crs + idx;
> @@ -436,6 +445,7 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl sdm845_smmu_500_impl = {
>  
>  static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_v2_impl = {
>  	.init_context = qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context,
> +	.cfg_probe = qcom_adreno_smmuv2_cfg_probe,
>  	.def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
>  	.alloc_context_bank = qcom_adreno_smmu_alloc_context_bank,
>  	.write_sctlr = qcom_adreno_smmu_write_sctlr,
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 931a3b3bccc96e7708c82b30b2b5fa82dfd04890
> change-id: 20240726-topic-845_gpu_smmu-ab738f7a013c
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux