Re: [PATCH v5 02/16] drm/msm/dpu: fix error condition in dpu_encoder_virt_atomic_mode_set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 6/24/2024 2:13 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
The commit b954fa6baaca ("drm/msm/dpu: Refactor rm iterator") removed
zero-init of the hw_ctl array, but didn't change the error condition,
that checked for hw_ctl[i] being NULL. Use indices check instead.

Fixes: b954fa6baaca ("drm/msm/dpu: Refactor rm iterator")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
index 5d205e09cf45..7613005fbfea 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
@@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ static void dpu_encoder_virt_atomic_mode_set(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc,
  			return;
  		}
- if (!hw_ctl[i]) {
+		if (i >= num_ctl) {

This is not very clear to me.

How will we hit this condition? I dont see i going beyond 1 in this loop and neither should num_ctl

Will it be just easier to bring back the NULL assignment at the top?

struct dpu_hw_blk *hw_ctl[MAX_CHANNELS_PER_ENC] = { NULL };

I also see the same issue for other blocks such as hw_dsc, hw_lm

  			DPU_ERROR_ENC(dpu_enc,
  				"no ctl block assigned at idx: %d\n", i);
  			return;





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux