On 4/18/2016 3:19 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:17:36AM -0600, Sagar Dharia wrote:
Please leave blank lines between paragraphs, it makes things much easier
to read than a wall of uninterrupted text.
+ ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, dev->irq, msm_slim_interrupt,
+ IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH, "msm_slim_irq", dev);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "request IRQ failed\n");
+ goto err_request_irq_failed;
+ }
Are you sure this is safe and we don't deallocate things the interrupt
handler uses before we disable the interrupt?
Since clock is not enabled before this step, we won't be getting any
interrupts from HW at this stage.
No, that's not what I'm saying - I'm asking about the *disable* path on
remove.
Good point, I will change the del_controller as well to enter clock-pause,
and the controller's remove function to disable interrupt.
Thanks
Sagar
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
