Re: [PATCH 01/47] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document QCS9100 SoC and RIDE board

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/07/2024 09:13, Aiqun Yu (Maria) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/8/2024 2:07 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 08/07/2024 06:45, Aiqun Yu (Maria) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/3/2024 5:33 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 03/07/2024 11:21, Tengfei Fan wrote:
>>>>>>>         - items:
>>>>>>>             - enum:
>>>>>>> +              - qcom,qcs9100-ride
>>>>>>>                 - qcom,sa8775p-ride
>>>>>>> +          - const: qcom,qcs9100
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This changes existing compatible for sa8775p without any explanation in
>>>>>> commit msg.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In the next verion patch series, I will provide relevant explanatory 
>>>>> information in this patch commit message.
>>>>
>>>> TBH, I cannot think of any reasonable explanation for this, especially
>>>> considering rest of the patchset which does not fix resulting dtbs_check
>>>> warning.
>>>
>>> The existing compatible "sa8775p" warning can only be addressed When
>>> @Nikunj's "sa8775p" changes merged.
>>>
>>> Let me know if you have other suggestions for this.
>>
>> I don't have, because I don't understand why do you want/need to change
>> existing board compatible.
> 
> We can left the current existing sa8775p board compatible as it is. And
> have a brand new qcs9100 and qcs9100-board item for current non-scmi
> resources compatible.
> 
> Will that be more reasonable from your end?

Yes, this is what I would expect. If you choose any other way - just
like I wrote - you need to explain why you are doing this.

Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux