On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 10:16:35AM GMT, Abel Vesa wrote:
> The x1e80100, being a compute platform, provides functionality for the
> exact same power supplies as sc8280xp. Add the compatible and assign
> the sc8280xp match data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c
> index ec163d1bcd18..46f36dcb185c 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c
> @@ -1308,6 +1308,7 @@ static void qcom_battmgr_pdr_notify(void *priv, int state)
> static const struct of_device_id qcom_battmgr_of_variants[] = {
> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP },
> { .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP },
Do we have a bindings patch somewhere? If these devices are compatible,
what about using a fallback entry instead?
> /* Unmatched devices falls back to QCOM_BATTMGR_SM8350 */
> {}
> };
>
> ---
> base-commit: 2102cb0d050d34d50b9642a3a50861787527e922
> change-id: 20240522-x1e80100-power-supply-qcom-battmgr-83442b7cce60
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
