Re: [PATCH] power: supply: qcom_battmgr: Enable battery support on x1e80100

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 10:16:35AM GMT, Abel Vesa wrote:
> The x1e80100, being a compute platform, provides functionality for the
> exact same power supplies as sc8280xp. Add the compatible and assign
> the sc8280xp match data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c
> index ec163d1bcd18..46f36dcb185c 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/qcom_battmgr.c
> @@ -1308,6 +1308,7 @@ static void qcom_battmgr_pdr_notify(void *priv, int state)
>  static const struct of_device_id qcom_battmgr_of_variants[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8180x-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sc8280xp-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-pmic-glink", .data = (void *)QCOM_BATTMGR_SC8280XP },

Do we have a bindings patch somewhere? If these devices are compatible,
what about using a fallback entry instead?

>  	/* Unmatched devices falls back to QCOM_BATTMGR_SM8350 */
>  	{}
>  };
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 2102cb0d050d34d50b9642a3a50861787527e922
> change-id: 20240522-x1e80100-power-supply-qcom-battmgr-83442b7cce60
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux