On 20/06/2024 17:07, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 03:30:29PM GMT, Caleb Connolly wrote:
On 20/06/2024 15:15, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 23:33, Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Give a hint to the OS which role we prefer. Host mode generally makes
the most sense.
Why?
I guess this is subjective, but on these boards the more common usecase is
host mode (before we had role switching we forced them to host mode...).
Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qrb4210-rb2.dts | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Would it make sense to set this for all the RB and HDK boards?
The rb1/2 are the only boards which lack multiple USB controllers. For
others it's fine to leave the default (peripheral mode).
SM8450-HDK and SM8650-HDK also have just a single USB-C port. My logic
was slightly different. We consider these devices to be SBCs, so I'd
expect that they act as hosts _by_default_. If somebody plugs RB board
into a laptop, then it's logical that it should work as a device, but
between the phone and the RB board the RB is a host.
Ahh I see, then yes perhaps it makes sense. I can send v2 with patches
for other boards too.
* qrb2210-rb1
* qrb4210-rb2
* sm8450-hdk
* sm8650-hdk
Any others?
--
// Caleb (they/them)
