Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] leds: sy7802: Add support for Silergy SY7802 flash LED controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 12/06/2024 à 23:01, André Apitzsch via B4 Relay a écrit :
From: André Apitzsch <git@xxxxxxxxxxx>

The SY7802 is a current-regulated charge pump which can regulate two
current levels for Flash and Torch modes.

It is a high-current synchronous boost converter with 2-channel high
side current sources. Each channel is able to deliver 900mA current.

Signed-off-by: André Apitzsch <git@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/leds/flash/Kconfig       |  11 +
  drivers/leds/flash/Makefile      |   1 +
  drivers/leds/flash/leds-sy7802.c | 546 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 558 insertions(+)


Hi,

...

+static int sy7802_probe_dt(struct sy7802 *chip)
+{
+	struct device_node *np = dev_of_node(chip->dev);
+	struct device_node *child;
+	int child_num;
+	int ret;
+
+	regmap_write(chip->regmap, SY7802_REG_ENABLE, SY7802_MODE_OFF);
+	regmap_write(chip->regmap, SY7802_REG_TORCH_BRIGHTNESS, LED_OFF);
+
+	child_num = 0;
+	for_each_available_child_of_node(np, child) {

Using for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() would slightly simplify the code below.

+		struct sy7802_led *led = chip->leds + child_num;
+
+		led->chip = chip;
+		led->led_id = child_num;
+
+		ret = sy7802_init_flash_properties(chip->dev, led, child);
+		if (ret) {
+			of_node_put(child);
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		ret = sy7802_led_register(chip->dev, led, child);
+		if (ret) {
+			of_node_put(child);
+			return ret;
+		}
+
+		child_num++;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}

...

+static int sy7802_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
+	struct sy7802 *chip;
+	size_t count;
+	int ret;
+
+	count = device_get_child_node_count(dev);
+	if (!count || count > SY7802_MAX_LEDS)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Invalid amount of LED nodes %zu\n", count);
+
+	chip = devm_kzalloc(dev, struct_size(chip, leds, count), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!chip)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	chip->num_leds = count;
+
+	chip->dev = dev;
+	i2c_set_clientdata(client, chip);
+
+	chip->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "enable", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+	ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(chip->enable_gpio);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to request enable gpio\n");
+
+	chip->vin_regulator = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vin");
+	ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(chip->vin_regulator);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to request regulator\n");
+
+	ret = regulator_enable(chip->vin_regulator);
+	if (ret)
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to enable regulator\n");
+
+	ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &chip->mutex);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;

The regulator_enable() above is not balanced if we return here.

+
+	mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
+
+	chip->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &sy7802_regmap_config);
+	if (IS_ERR(chip->regmap)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(chip->regmap);
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);

dev_err_probe() to be consistent with the code above?

+		goto error;
+	}
+
+	ret = devm_add_action(dev, sy7802_chip_disable_action, chip);

I think that having 2 devm_add_action_or_reset() each at a logical location, 1 for regulator_disable() and 1 for sy7802_disable() would help.

+	if (ret)
+		goto error;
+
+	ret = sy7802_probe_dt(chip);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto error;
+
+	sy7802_enable(chip);
+
+	ret = sy7802_chip_check(chip);
+	if (ret) {
+		sy7802_disable(chip);
+		goto error;
+	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
+
+	return 0;
+
+error:
+	regulator_disable(chip->vin_regulator);
+	mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
+	return ret;
+}

CJ

...





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux