Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] drm/msm/dpu: support setting the TE source

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-06-13 20:05:10, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Make the DPU driver use the TE source specified in the DT. If none is
> specified, the driver defaults to the first GPIO (mdp_vsync0).

mdp_vsync_p?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
> index e9991f3756d4..6fcb3cf4a382 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
> @@ -505,6 +505,44 @@ static void dpu_kms_wait_flush(struct msm_kms *kms, unsigned crtc_mask)
>  		dpu_kms_wait_for_commit_done(kms, crtc);
>  }
>  
> +static const char *dpu_vsync_sources[] = {
> +	[DPU_VSYNC_SOURCE_GPIO_0] = "mdp_vsync_p",
> +	[DPU_VSYNC_SOURCE_GPIO_1] = "mdp_vsync_s",
> +	[DPU_VSYNC_SOURCE_GPIO_2] = "mdp_vsync_e",
> +	[DPU_VSYNC_SOURCE_INTF_0] = "mdp_intf0",
> +	[DPU_VSYNC_SOURCE_INTF_1] = "mdp_intf1",
> +	[DPU_VSYNC_SOURCE_INTF_2] = "mdp_intf2",
> +	[DPU_VSYNC_SOURCE_INTF_3] = "mdp_intf3",
> +	[DPU_VSYNC_SOURCE_WD_TIMER_0] = "timer0",
> +	[DPU_VSYNC_SOURCE_WD_TIMER_1] = "timer1",
> +	[DPU_VSYNC_SOURCE_WD_TIMER_2] = "timer2",
> +	[DPU_VSYNC_SOURCE_WD_TIMER_3] = "timer3",
> +	[DPU_VSYNC_SOURCE_WD_TIMER_4] = "timer4",
> +};
> +
> +static int dpu_kms_dsi_set_te_source(struct msm_display_info *info,
> +				     struct msm_dsi *dsi)
> +{
> +	const char *te_source = msm_dsi_get_te_source(dsi);

Just checking: if the TE source is different and one has dual-DSI, it must be
set on both controllers?

> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!te_source) {
> +		info->vsync_source = DPU_VSYNC_SOURCE_GPIO_0;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* we can not use match_string since dpu_vsync_sources is a sparse array */

Instead of having gaps in the array, you could also store both the vsync_source
and name as the array elements?

> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dpu_vsync_sources); i++) {
> +		if (dpu_vsync_sources[i] &&
> +		    !strcmp(dpu_vsync_sources[i], te_source)) {
> +			info->vsync_source = i;
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
>  static int _dpu_kms_initialize_dsi(struct drm_device *dev,
>  				    struct msm_drm_private *priv,
>  				    struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms)
> @@ -543,7 +581,11 @@ static int _dpu_kms_initialize_dsi(struct drm_device *dev,
>  
>  		info.is_cmd_mode = msm_dsi_is_cmd_mode(priv->dsi[i]);
>  
> -		info.vsync_source = DPU_VSYNC_SOURCE_GPIO_0;
> +		rc = dpu_kms_dsi_set_te_source(&info, priv->dsi[i]);
> +		if (rc) {
> +			DPU_ERROR("failed to identify TE source for dsi display\n");
> +			return rc;
> +		}
>  
>  		encoder = dpu_encoder_init(dev, DRM_MODE_ENCODER_DSI, &info);
>  		if (IS_ERR(encoder)) {
> 
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux