On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 04:07:23PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 4.05.2024 10:01 AM, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > > Bjorn, > > > >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 12:12:08PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > >> MSM platforms manage NoC related clocks and scaling from RPM. > >> However, in IPQ SoCs, RPM is not involved in managing NoC > >> related clocks and there is no NoC scaling. > >> > >> However, there is a requirement to enable some NoC interface > >> clocks for the accessing the peripherals present in the > >> system. Hence add a minimalistic interconnect driver that > >> establishes a path from the processor/memory to those peripherals > >> and vice versa. > >> > >> Change icc-clk driver to take master and slave ids instead > >> of auto generating. > >> > >> Currently, drivers/clk/qcom/clk-cbf-8996.c is the only user of > >> icc-clk. And, it had exactly one master and one slave node. > >> For this the auto generated master (= 1) and slave (= 0) was > >> enough. > >> > >> However, when drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq9574.c wanted to make use > >> of the icc-clk framework, it had more number of master and slave > >> nodes and the auto generated ids did not suit the usage. > >> > >> --- > >> v11: No code changes > >> Commit log changed for the first patch > >> Added Acked-By: to 3 patches > > > > Can this be included in your driver changes for 6.10? > Konrad, > FWIW there is still an open discussion at v9 > <CAA8EJpqENsojPQmCbma_nQLEZq8nK1fz1K0JdtvLd=kPrH_DBw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for reminding. Have responded to it. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/Zmgb+OjdBNw71sC1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ -Varada
