On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 05:22:03PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 04/06/2024 17:14, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I didnt follow why this is a link property. Sorry , I didnt follow the > >>>>>> split part. > >>>>> > >>>>> There is a link between the DSI host and the panel. I don't want to > >>>>> end up in a situation when the properties of the link are split > >>>>> between two different nodes. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> It really depends on what the property denotes. I do not think this > >>>> should be the reason to do it this way. > >>> > >>> It denotes how the panel signals DPU that it finished processing the > >>> data (please excuse me for possibly inaccurate description). However > >>> there is no direct link between the panel and the DPU. So we should be > >>> using a link between DSI host and the panel. > >>> > >> > >> Yes, I totally agree that we should be using a link between DSI host and the > >> panel. > >> > >> My question from the beginning has been why the output port? > >> > >> It looks like to me we need to have another input port to the controller > >> then? > >> > >> One from DPU and the other from panel? > > > > Dear DT maintainers, could you please comment on the OF graph entries? > > Are they considered to be unidirectional or bidirectional? > > > > Would you suggest adding another arc to the OF graph in our case or is > > it fine to have a signal generated by the panel in the 'panel_in' port? > > Which pin are we talking about? DSI or panel? Commit msg suggests DSI, > so property is in DSI node part. Seems logical to me. Input pin on the DSI side. -- With best wishes Dmitry
