On Tue 15 Dec 04:30 PST 2015, Georgi Djakov wrote: [..] > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c [..] > + > +static struct clk_rpm *apq8064_clks[] = { > + [QCOM_RPM_PXO_CLK] = &apq8064_pxo, > + [QCOM_RPM_CXO_CLK] = &apq8064_cxo, > + [QCOM_RPM_APPS_FABRIC_CLK] = &apq8064_afab_clk, > + [QCOM_RPM_CFPB_CLK] = &apq8064_cfpb_clk, > + [QCOM_RPM_DAYTONA_FABRIC_CLK] = &apq8064_daytona_clk, > + [QCOM_RPM_EBI1_CLK] = &apq8064_ebi1_clk, > + [QCOM_RPM_MM_FABRIC_CLK] = &apq8064_mmfab_clk, > + [QCOM_RPM_MMFPB_CLK] = &apq8064_mmfpb_clk, > + [QCOM_RPM_SYS_FABRIC_CLK] = &apq8064_sfab_clk, > + [QCOM_RPM_SFPB_CLK] = &apq8064_sfpb_clk, > + [QCOM_RPM_QDSS_CLK] = &apq8064_qdss_clk, > +}; > + I do believe we did discuss this, but fwiw, do we really want the rpm resource identifiers here? Rather than something clock specific (from qcom,rpmcc.h)? Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html