Hi,
thanks for CCing me.
On 5/24/24 17:51, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 21.05.2024 9:00 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Hi Elliot,
On Tue, 21 May 2024 at 21:41, Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Device manufacturers frequently ship multiple boards or SKUs under a
single software package. These software packages will ship multiple
devicetree blobs and require some mechanism to pick the correct DTB for
the board the software package was deployed. Introduce a common
definition for adding board identifiers to device trees. board-id
provides a mechanism for bootloaders to select the appropriate DTB which
is vendor/OEM-agnostic.
This is a v3 of the RFC, however it is still a qcom-only series. Might
I suggest gaining an actual interest from any other hardware vendor
(in the form of the patches) before posting v4? Otherwise it might
still end up being a Qualcomm solution which is not supported and/or
used by other hardware vendors.
AMD should be onboard [1].
Konrad
[1] https://resources.linaro.org/en/resource/q7U3Rr7m3ZbZmXzYK7A9u3
I am trying to wrap my head around this and I have also looked at that EOSS
presentation.
I don't think I fully understand your case.
There are multiple components which you need to detect. SOC - I expect reading
by some regs, board - I expect you have any eeprom, OTP, adc, gpio, etc way how
to detect board ID and revision.
And then you mentioned displays - how do you detect them?
In our Kria platform we have eeproms on SOM and CC cards (or FMC/extension
cards) which we read and decode and based on information from it we are
composing "unique" string. And then we are having DTBs in FIT image where
description of configuration it taken as regular expression. That's why it is up
to you how you want to combine them.
Currently we are merging them offline and we are not applying any DT overlay at
run time but can be done (we are missing one missing piece in U-Boot for it).
In presentation you mentioned also that applying overlay can fail but not sure
how you can reach it. Because Linux kernel has the whole infrastructure to cover
all combinations with base DT + overlays. It means if you cover all working
combinations there you should see if they don't apply properly.
Also do you really need to detect everything from firmware side? Or isn't it
enough to have just "some" devices and then load the rest where you are in OS?
I think that's pretty much another way to go to have bare minimum functionality
provided by firmware and deal with the rest in OS.
Thanks,
Michal
