On Wed, 1 May 2024 at 11:32, Satya Priya Kakitapalli
<quic_skakitap@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> SM8150 videocc needs AHB clock, so update the bindings for sm8150
> to add the AHB clock.
>
> Fixes: 35d26e9292e2 ("dt-bindings: clock: Add YAML schemas for the QCOM VIDEOCC clock bindings")
The tag is incorrect. The mentioned commit didn't add sm8150 bindings,
so it didn't have a bug.
> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml
> index 6999e36ace1b..68bac801adb0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml
> @@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ allOf:
> enum:
> - qcom,sc7180-videocc
> - qcom,sdm845-videocc
> - - qcom,sm8150-videocc
> then:
> properties:
> clocks:
> @@ -101,6 +100,22 @@ allOf:
> - const: bi_tcxo
> - const: bi_tcxo_ao
>
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - qcom,sm8150-videocc
Could you please extend the sm8250 case instead of defining a new one?
Also could you please check if there is a clock (like ahb_clk_src)
that uses bi_tcxo_ao instead of bi_tcxo? If so, we have to add this
clock to the bindings even if the driver doesn't use/model it at this
point.
> + then:
> + properties:
> + clocks:
> + items:
> + - description: AHB
> + - description: Board XO source
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: iface
> + - const: bi_tcxo
> +
> - if:
> properties:
> compatible:
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
